Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Working Class results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,723 hits. Analysis detected 8,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,866 of 16,562 topics). This Working Class is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Working Class
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos