Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce Trends results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 275 hits. Analysis detected 1,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,480 of 16,562 topics). This Workforce Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Workforce Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.3%12.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos