Topic summary
⁠89%4 analyzed articles/videos1,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 988 hits. Analysis detected 9,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,851 of 16,562 topics). This Workforce is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Workforce
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.6%14.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.5%16.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos