Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Women's Tennis results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Women's Tennis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Women's Tennis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos