Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,082 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karissa Donkin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 2,027 hits . Analysis detected 7,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,476 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,328 of 6,611 authors). This Karissa Donkin is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Karissa Donkin
Author details
Total words: 10,476
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.4% 19.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst