Topic summary
⁠39%3 analyzed articles/videos5,970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Soccer results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 10,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,658 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,789 of 16,343 topics). This Women's Soccer is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Women's Soccer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,658
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos