Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Hockey results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 5,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,242 of 16,558 topics). This Women's Hockey is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Women's Hockey
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,136
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos