Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women’s History Museum results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, In-Group Bias, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,188 of 15,149 topics). This Women’s History Museum is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Women’s History Museum
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Alameda County1%
⁠73%Women’s History Museum (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos