Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Basketball results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 689 hits. Analysis detected 4,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,248 of 16,562 topics). This Women's Basketball is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Women's Basketball
Topic details
Total words: 3,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos