Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Myles Dichter results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 683 hits . Analysis detected 3,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,067 of 6,570 authors). This Myles Dichter is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Myles Dichter
Author details
Total words: 4,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst