Topic summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women In Prison results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 2,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,299 of 16,562 topics). This Women In Prison is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Women In Prison
Topic details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst