Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 1,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,521 of 16,494 topics). This Wisconsin is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Wisconsin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,744
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos