Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winter Traditions results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 474 hits . Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,710 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of â 82% (3,001 of 16,562 topics). This Winter Traditions is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Winter Traditions
Topic details
Total words: 1,710
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.9% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 27.7% 27.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Representativeness Heuris⌠Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst