Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chandra Colvin results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 891 hits . Analysis detected 4,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,774 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,717 of 6,628 authors). This Chandra Colvin is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Chandra Colvin
Author details
Total words: 4,774
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 18.7% 18.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 18.7%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst