Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winter Olympics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 2,525 hits. Analysis detected 22,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,198 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,582 of 16,244 topics). This Winter Olympics is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Winter Olympics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,198
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.5%15.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.2%16.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.7%17.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.2%8.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos