Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Ferrell results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 489 hits. Analysis detected 3,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,193 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,014 of 15,686 topics). This Will Ferrell is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Will Ferrell
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,193
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos