Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video1,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Viewing results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,075 hits. Analysis detected 3,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,887 of 16,559 topics). This Wildlife Viewing is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Wildlife Viewing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 21.4%21.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Indoctrination: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos