Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Discovery results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 820 hits. Analysis detected 3,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,336 of 16,562 topics). This Wildlife Discovery is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Wildlife Discovery
Topic details
Total words: 3,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.9%12.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos