Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wildfire Relief results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 1,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,107 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Wildfire Relief is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wildfire Relief
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,107
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.2%28.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos