Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White Working Class results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,723 hits. Analysis detected 8,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,865 of 16,562 topics). This White Working Class is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
White Working Class
Topic details
Total words: 6,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos