Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White Phosphorus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 284 hits. Analysis detected 1,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,811 topics). This White Phosphorus is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
White Phosphorus
Topic details
Total words: 2,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos