Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These White House Staff results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 357 hits . Analysis detected 1,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This White House Staff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. White House Staff
Topic details
Total words: 1,236
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 28.9% 28.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 18.8% 18.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst