Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Renovations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 2,058 hits. Analysis detected 12,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,602 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (4,912 of 15,690 topics). This White House Renovations is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
White House Renovations
Topic details
Total words: 7,602
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.4%24.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.5%18.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.1%27.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos