Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Affairs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anchoring Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 718 hits. Analysis detected 2,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,525 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,131 of 16,509 topics). This White House Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
White House Affairs
Topic details
Total words: 3,525
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos