Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whale Strandings results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 432 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,146 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,121 of 16,562 topics). This Whale Strandings is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Whale Strandings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,146
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos