Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Western World Security results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 1,515 hits. Analysis detected 9,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,099 of 16,562 topics). This Western World Security is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Western World Security
Topic details
Total words: 3,018
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.4% percentile
10.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 40.2%40.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 50.2%50.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 34.8%34.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 29.9%29.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 50.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 40.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos