Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Pollock results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 2,706 hits. Analysis detected 21,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,298 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,556 of 6,365 authors). This Richard Pollock is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Richard Pollock
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Richard Pollock (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,298
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.1%19.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.3%9.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.9%23.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 15.2%15.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos