Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Western Perceptions Of Ukraine results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 4,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,375 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,319 of 16,562 topics). This Western Perceptions Of Ukraine is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Western Perceptions Of Ukraine
Topic details
Total words: 3,375
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.3%21.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos