Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wes Anderson results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 1,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,010 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,900 of 16,562 topics). This Wes Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Wes Anderson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,010
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos