Topic summary
⁠9%2 analyzed articles/videos220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weight Management results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 2,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,902 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,090 of 16,129 topics). This Weight Management is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Weight Management
Topic details
Total words: 3,902
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos