Asking Eric: Perimenopause treatment prompts awkward questions 14%

By R. Eric Thomas33%

7/14/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 785 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,334 of 21,169 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the article peer group.

Dear Eric: Like many women in perimenopause, when my hormones started getting out of whack, I gained about 25 pounds due to a sudden and uncontrollable hunger (estrogen helps moderate ghrelin, the hunger hormone). 
When I finally started hormone replacement therapy, I got the constant hunger and other issues back under control and worked hard to return to my normal weight. 
People who see me now will often ask if I am “on medication” to lose weight. 
I know what they mean is GLP-1s, so I don’t want to say “yes,” but I also wouldn’t have been able to stop my weight from ballooning without hormonal therapy, so the answer isn’t really “no.” 
I also had to be diligent about diet and exercise to get my weight back down once the uncontrollable hunger went away, and I don’t want to dismiss the hard work I had to do. 
What’s a good way to answer this question without going into personal details with acquaintances? 
 Perimenopause Questions 
Dear Questions: A good place to start is by asking them in return, “why do you ask?” 
This can help divert people who are just being nosy and clarify the intention of others. 
Some may be seeking your advice about GLP-1s and so you can let them know that you don’t have the expertise they’re assuming. 
Others might be looking for diet and exercise advice. 
You’re under no obligation to say anything about your own medical care or your body. 
So, while I understand the distinction you’re making about hormone replacement therapy being a helpful medical intervention, its primary purpose is not weight loss. 
So, if someone is asking you about weight loss drugs, it’s fair to simply say “no.” 
If you feel compelled to elaborate, you can say, “there are a lot of factors that contributed to my weight gain and weight loss.” 
But, again, only if you want to. 
There’s no shame in any of this, but no one is required to go into detail about their own body. 
Dear Eric: In the letter from “Feeling Guilty” I could hear the voices of all of my families. 
I’m a home hospice nurse, and anyone who has had to place a family member in a setting other than home feels this exact same way. 
One option that I would recommend for FG to explore would be group homes in their area. 
A group home is a private home that is set up for people like the letter writer’s mother to live, where caregivers are there 24/7 to manage medications, cook, clean, assist with personal care, et cetera. 
The cost is usually a little less than an assisted-living facility, and they are bound by the same licensure and care standards as any ALF. 
FG can find a list of these places from the local aging services division or services like A Place For Mom. 
The homes work with all outside care providers like home health or hospice. 
The most important part of choosing a home is going and touring them; the vibe is very individual and very important. 
Mom definitely needs to be in on the tours so that she can get the feel of them. 
 Hospice Nurse 
Dear Nurse: Thank you for this very comprehensive recommendation. 
Dear Eric: “Feeling Guilty” was suffering with her mother’s unhappiness in assisted living. 
Your advice to work with mom’s care team and primary care doctor was totally correct. 
But I’d also spend some time at the facility getting to know the other residents to verify whether they are generally feeling happy and safe. 
Getting to know the care team is also truly helpful. 
You may learn that mom is putting on a show for the family and is fine with everyone else. 
Perhaps relocating mom to another facility would be prudent if she’s truly miserable. 
I’d also suggest that reframing her thoughts might be healthy for Guilty. 
Making the hard decisions is, unfortunately, a part of the role of a caregiver. 
Guilt kind of goes with the territory. 
She should give herself a hug, remind herself that she’s doing what’s best for mom and learn to turn off the voices making her second guess everything. 
 Caregiver Sympathy 
Dear Sympathy: The suggestion of getting to know the facility is a good one. 
While the mother is grieving a loss of autonomy, it’s important for the caregiving daughter to make sure that the care she’s receiving is of the quality she expects. 
(Send questions to R. 
Eric Thomas at eric@askingeric.com or P.O. 
Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. 
Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at rericthomas.com.) 
©2026 Tribune Content Agency, LLC. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%R. Eric Thomas: 3.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%R. Eric Thomas: 1.8%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic7.0%This article: 4.3%R. Eric Thomas: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%R. Eric Thomas: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 4.2%R. Eric Thomas: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%R. Eric Thomas: 2.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.4%This article: 1.7%R. Eric Thomas: 1.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 2.7%R. Eric Thomas: 5.7%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias2.7%This article: 4.5%R. Eric Thomas: 2.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias4.5%This article: 9.0%R. Eric Thomas: 3.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error9.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%R. Eric Thomas: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.6%R. Eric Thomas: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority9.6%This article: 6.6%R. Eric Thomas: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma6.6%This article: 1.7%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope1.7%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 17.1%R. Eric Thomas: 4.2%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization17.1%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.6%R. Eric Thomas: 3.3%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.8%R. Eric Thomas: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.8%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.1%R. Eric Thomas: 2.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal10.1%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.1%R. Eric Thomas: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.1%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.7%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground2.7%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.3%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading2.3%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.6%R. Eric Thomas: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.6%R. Eric Thomas: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice14.6%This article: 30.7%R. Eric Thomas: 7.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination30.7%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%R. Eric Thomas: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.3%

785 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker0.6%attributed speech780writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTribune Content Agency, LLC. • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
0%flagged-word coverage
5 attributed words100% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination-30.9 ptsWriter: 30.9%Tribune Content Agency, LLC.: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.7 ptsWriter: 14.7%Tribune Content Agency, LLC.: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Tribune Content Agency, LLC.: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Tribune Content Agency, LLC.: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.