Keyword summary
20% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hospice Care results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,223 hits . Analysis detected 10,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,751 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (28,283 of 35,444 keywords). This Hospice Care is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Hospice Care
Keyword details
Total words: 13,751
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst