Topic summary
⁠18%2 analyzed articles/videos399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Perimenopause results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 3,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,439 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,467 of 15,984 topics). This Perimenopause is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Perimenopause
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,439
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos