Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weight Gain Causes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,599 of 16,562 topics). This Weight Gain Causes is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Weight Gain Causes
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠49%Weight Gain Causes (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.8%9.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos