Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Weigh Ins results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 329 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,559 topics). This Weigh Ins is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Weigh Ins
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos