Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Weather Disruptions results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 213 faulty-reasoning hits from 402 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,772 topics). This Weather Disruptions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Weather Disruptions
Topic details
Total words: 402
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles402 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos