Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealthy Couples Benefits results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 963 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,656 of 16,562 topics). This Wealthy Couples Benefits is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Wealthy Couples Benefits
Topic details
Total words: 1,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 29.2%29.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos