Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth Rankings results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.3% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 2,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,197 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,193 of 16,562 topics). This Wealth Rankings is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Wealth Rankings
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,197
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 52.3%52.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 25.3%25.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 27.8%27.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.4%20.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 19.0%19.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.1%22.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 52.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.4%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos