Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wealth And Fame results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 1,457 hits. Analysis detected 6,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,363 of 16,562 topics). This Wealth And Fame is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Wealth And Fame
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 44.5%44.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.6%25.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 44.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos