Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Watchdog Groups results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 4,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,443 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Watchdog Groups is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Watchdog Groups
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,443
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos