Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video984 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wastewater Heat Recovery results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 1,156 hits. Analysis detected 4,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,725 of 15,914 topics). This Wastewater Heat Recovery is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Wastewater Heat Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 2,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 39.2%39.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 23.2%23.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 39.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos