Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wars And Military Conflicts results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,974 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,780 topics). This Wars And Military Conflicts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Wars And Military Conflicts
Topic details
Total words: 1,974
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos