Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Warren Buffett's Philanthropy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Warren Buffett's Philanthropy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Warren Buffett's Philanthropy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Warren Buffett's Philanthropy (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos