Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warner Bros results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.4% saturation with 1,244 hits. Analysis detected 4,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,658 of 15,966 topics). This Warner Bros is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Warner Bros
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠90%Warner Bros (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.6% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 49.4%49.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.2%15.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 49.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos