Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Profiteering results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 4,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,847 of 16,442 topics). This War Profiteering is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
War Profiteering
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠34%War Profiteering (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos