Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Imagery results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 2,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,619 of 16,562 topics). This War Imagery is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
War Imagery
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos