Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video483 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Economy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 895 hits. Analysis detected 4,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,919 of 23,278 topics). This War Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
War Economy
Topic details
Total words: 1,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.8% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 46.3%46.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 21.3%21.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 23.4%23.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.0%21.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 46.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos