Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War And Emergency Powers (us) results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 706 hits. Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,882 of 16,562 topics). This War And Emergency Powers (us) is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
War And Emergency Powers (us)
Topic details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.1%14.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos