Topic summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wall Street Journal Editorial Board results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hindsight Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 440 hits . Analysis detected 2,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,640 of 16,562 topics). This Wall Street Journal Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Wall Street Journal Editorial Board
Topic details
Total words: 1,472
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 29.9% 29.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Middle Ground: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst