Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos2,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wage Theft results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 778 hits. Analysis detected 6,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,179 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (9,934 of 15,447 topics). This Wage Theft is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Wage Theft
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,179
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos